NORTH AMERICA

4,500 Ice Age Tools — Spread Across an Ancient Camp (Nova Scotia)

Debert (Nova Scotia) preserves 11 activity areas across ~22 acres and 4,500+ stone artifacts—plus a real-world example of how industrial ‘ochre’ claims get misattributed to archaeology.

2026-02-05 · 📍 Debert, Nova Scotia

Watch the Episode

Open on YouTube →

Debert: 4,500 Ice Age Tools in Nova Scotia Sands

Debert sits on sandy, dune-like ground in Nova Scotia—yet it preserves one of the clearest Early Paleoindian “activity landscapes” in the Canadian Maritimes.

The evidence-first takeaways:

  • 11 identified activity areas (“loci”)
  • Spread across ~22 acres
  • 4,500+ stone artifacts (tools + the flakes from toolmaking)
  • Toolstone includes rhyolite (RYE-oh-lite) and chalcedony (kal-SED-uh-nee)
  • The site is stewarded today by the Mi’kmawey Debert Cultural Centre (mee-GMAH-way DEH-bert)

What makes Debert unusual

Most Ice Age camp stories rely on bones, hearths, and preserved organics. Debert doesn’t give you much of that. The soils are acidic, so preservation is biased toward stone.

But stone is enough to read behavior:

  • Multiple loci suggest repeated use across time, not a one-off stop.
  • High debitage implies tool maintenance and production on site.
  • Imported lithic materials point to broader movement and logistics beyond the dune field.

Ochre, carefully

It’s easy for “ochre” to become a magnet for exaggerated claims. Here’s the safe framing:

  • Ochre use in the region is real and culturally significant.
  • At Debert, the defensible claim is trace presence / processing evidence, not bulk tonnage caches.

That distinction matters, because industrial mining and historic paint production can leak into modern retellings and get mistakenly attached to the archaeological site.

Why this site matters (even without dramatic preservation)

Debert is a proof-of-presence site for early Northeast occupation, and it’s a clean example of how archaeologists can map past behavior from lithic scatters alone.

If you remember one thing: big numbers and big claims travel faster than excavation documentation—and Debert is a perfect case study in keeping the story compelling without stretching the evidence.

Further reading (starter pack)

  • Penn Museum / Expedition Magazine: “The Debert Site”
  • HistoricPlaces.ca listing for Debert Palaeo-Indian Site National Historic Site
  • Mi’kmawey Debert Cultural Centre: “Understanding and Protecting the Sites”
  • Atlantic Canada geology context (Debert project publications via UNB / Atlantic Geoscience Society)

Watch / Explore

Evidence at a Glance

Key signals, kept separate from interpretation.

Date range

~13,000 years ago (Younger Dryas era)

Artifact count

~4,500+ stone artifacts

Site structure

11 loci across ~22 acres

Preservation bias

Acidic soils favor stone over organics

Stewardship

Mi’kmawey Debert Cultural Centre

Forensic Breakdown

A quick comparison table when the case benefits from it.

Claim What people say What the evidence supports
“5 tons of red ochre at Debert” A massive ritual cache at the site Not supported by excavation reports; the ‘5 tons’ figure traces to industrial ore/mining records in the region.
“240,000 artifacts at Debert” A quarter-million artifacts were recovered Not supported; the number is commonly a survey-area figure (m²) or a mix-up with other debitage-heavy sites.
“McLean Cache” at Debert A named cache proves a specific story Not supported in the Debert context; appears to be a name conflation from unrelated Paleoindian references.
← Back to NORTH AMERICA Hub